Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Krissy Eliot's avatar

I've always done this puzzle method when writing articles or short stories, but up until recently didn't give myself permission to do this with a novel. Here's why: In a smaller piece of work, it's "acceptable" to my brain to be confused or in intellectual limbo for a shorter period of time. With short pieces, you can get to the smart stuff quicker. You're a chicken with your head cut off, sure. But you know that VERY soon, the head'll grow back and you'll be smart again. You'll feel validated with your completed piece. With your profound EPIPHANY. You don't have to stay in that dummy mind-space that you don't like for more than an hour. Maybe a day or two. Tops.

But with a novel, turns out you have to be an idiot for who knows how long! You're helpless. Possibly decapitated forever. You don't know if you're ever gonna find the smart stuff with this honkin' block of text.

This book I'm writing, Chuck? It's ego death. It's a swift cut to my long, swan neck. It's a sharp lesson that to be a smart novelist, you first have to be a fuckin' frickin' fool. It's everything I've never liked.

But for some reason, I love it. And I'm doing it anyway.

Expand full comment
Jake Gardner's avatar

Thanks, Chuck. I needed this. I started the morning with an exploded water heater flooding my basement, and it had me discombobulated. I’m just gonna roll with it. Stay dry!

Expand full comment
39 more comments...

No posts