By not having a child I miss out
When you have a child you’re forced to revisit decisions and choices you made as a child. You witness someone at the same crossroads, and you get a second chance to recognize your mistakes. Both you and the child benefit from your do-over.
But what if you’re childless? A writer gets to relive the past in his/her work, and ultimately recognize mistakes that can be corrected. Not by writing in a literal way about that past, but by putting a character through circumstances that eventually come to represent the writer’s life. In writing Fight Club I came to embrace the fact that furniture will not make me an adult. In writing Choke I saw that pleasing authority figures will not bring me love. In that way—yes—the character becomes a surrogate self that allows you a second childhood, and a chance to correct your mistakes.
For example
For the past few days I’ve seen that the folk rock singer Gordon Lightfoot killed a man. It seems that Lightfoot—the author of The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald and many other hits—held the man in a choke hold that led to the death. This, despite the fact that Gordon Lightfoot died recently.
Course correction
This is the kind of recalibration that raising kids and writing characters allows you.
For my daughter it is more or less giving her guidance I wished I would have gotten as a child at her age. So I guess revisiting those aspects. I get to be the Mother and the Father in a lot of aspects
You may be child-free, but your legacy lives on. I'm taking a workshop this week at an art school in Tribeca. Walking around during breaks, I'm seeing the Fight Club logo stenciled on sidewalks all around the neighborhood. (No idea for what specific purpose. It seems completely random. But it makes me smile.)